Home Office to face legal battle over conditions at Manston migrant centre
Kent council chiefs warn they are ‘at breaking point’ trying to cope as hotels booked up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Home Office is facing a judicial review over conditions at the Manston migrant centre in Kent, the immigration minister has said.
Robert Jenrick said the government has received “initial contact” for a judicial review after reports of severe overcrowding.
Council leaders from across Kent have told the Home Office they are “at breaking point”, after new facilities keep opening up to process migrants and hotels are booked up to house them.
Hundreds of people are thought to have been moved out of the disused airfield site near Ramsgate following concerns it had become dangerously overcrowded this week.
But migrants held at Manston have begged for help, describing the conditions as a prison. A young girl threw a bottle containing a letter over the perimeter fence, claiming there were pregnant women and sick detainees at the Kent facility.
Manston, in Thanet, north Kent, is meant to house up to 1,600 people but has been housing about 4,000, according to MPs.
Mr Jenrick told Sky’s The Take with Sophy Ridge programme: “I believe we have received the initial contact for a judicial review.
“That’s not unusual - this is a highly litigious area of policy but of course, as the minister responsible I want to make sure everything we do is conducted appropriately and within the law.”
Mr Jenrick said he could not reveal who had brought the judicial review as it was legally sensitive.
The minister, who was appointed to the job last week by Rishi Sunak, said he has been working with home secretary Suella Braverman to reduce the numbers of people and the time they were staying at Manston – which is only meant to be 24 hours but has been much longer in some cases.
He added: “So the week I’ve been in post I’ve tried to work night and day to ensure the Manston site is not just legally compliant but is a humane and compassionate place where we welcome those migrants, treat them appropriately and then they leave quickly to alternative accommodation.
“I’m pleased to say that this evening that’s the path we’re on, the numbers at Manston have fallen very substantially since the weekend when we became aware of the specific issues and got involved so directly.”
Meanwhile, the 14 Kent local authority chiefs have accused the department of an “unsustainable and unacceptable” response to the crisis, demanding ministers “stop using their county as an easy fix”.
The leaders told the government they were under disproportionate pressure because of their location.
Four senior MPs have also piled further pressure on the home secretary to explain how the government will get to grips with the migrant crisis.
The parliamentary committee chairs have jointly written to Ms Braverman calling for clarity on how the Home Office will cut the number of treacherous small boat crossings and reduce “as a matter of urgency” the backlog in cases currently within the asylum system.
In their letter to Ms Braverman, the committee chairs call for clarity on what policies the Home Office has in place to address the conditions at the centre and ensure it does not face such overcrowding again.
The letter is signed by the chairs of the Home Affairs Committee, Justice Committee, Joint Committee on Human Rights and Women and Equalities Committee, and requests a response by November 16.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments