Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Thousands to get benefits for mental health issues after ‘landmark’ ruling

Judge rules entitlement to personal independence payment (PIP) should extend to cover more people who find social situations debilitating

May Bulman
Social Affairs Correspondent
Friday 19 July 2019 05:19 EDT
Comments
Supreme Court judge rules that entitlement to personal independence payment (PIP) should extend to cover more people who find social situations debilitating, in what has been hailed a “landmark moment” for disabled people
Supreme Court judge rules that entitlement to personal independence payment (PIP) should extend to cover more people who find social situations debilitating, in what has been hailed a “landmark moment” for disabled people (Alamy)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Thousands of mental health sufferers could now be eligible for disability benefits following a landmark ruling in the Supreme Court.

A judge ruled on Thursday that entitlement to personal independence payment (PIP) should extend to cover more people who find social situations debilitating, in what has been hailed a “landmark moment” for disabled people.

The ruling was made following a challenge by a PIP claimant, a 47-year-old man known as MM, about the way the points-scoring system works in assessments for the benefit.

The mental health charity Mind intervened to support his challenge because of the wider issues his case raised for people with mental health problems.

MM and Mind successfully argued that the Department for Work and Pensions needs to clearly define what counts as support and not dismiss the kinds of help that many people with mental health problems rely on.

The new ruling could especially affect people whose mental health problems lead to isolation and problems interacting, meaning more people who need different kinds of help – such as ongoing encouragement to leave their house and engage socially – will be able to benefit from PIP.

Mind said it was too early to know the exact number of people who would be affected, but that on the basis that more than 425,000 people with conditions classed as “psychiatric disorders” had been turned down for the benefit since PIP was introduced, thousands were likely to benefit.

Sophie Corlett, Mind’s director of external relations, added: “Far too many people are struggling to claim benefits they need because of draconian assessments, which often fail to take fully into account the impact a mental health problem can have.

“Living with a mental health problem can be extremely isolating but with the right support people can maintain important social connections that in turn can improve their wellbeing.”

A DWP spokesperson said: “We are pleased that the court recognised that there must be a need for social support to be provided by a trained or experienced person. We will carefully consider the full judgment so that we, working with disabled people and stakeholders, implement it fully and fairly, so that claimants get the PIP support they are entitled to.
“Supporting disabled people and those with mental health conditions is a priority. That is why PIP is a better benefit for people with mental health conditions compared to Disability Living Allowance; the proportion who get the higher rate of PIP is five times higher than under DLA.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in