Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Marks & Spencer faces threat of 'zombie seal' protests over links to salmon farm with worst culling record

Norwegian-owned salmon producer has legally killed 56 seals since 2013

Jamie Merrill
Tuesday 01 September 2015 15:33 EDT
Comments
Scottish Sea Farms' Lismore North farm in Oban
Scottish Sea Farms' Lismore North farm in Oban (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Marks & Spencer is at the centre of a seal culling scandal after it was revealed that it gets salmon for its premium range from the Scottish fish farm with the worst record for killing the protected mammal.

The Lochmuir range is farmed exclusively for Marks & Spencer by Scottish Seafarms across the far north of Scotland, but the high street retailer now risks protests outside its stores after it was revealed by campaigners that the Norwegian-owned salmon producer had legally killed 56 seals since 2013 under a Scottish government licence scheme.

The fish-farming industry, worth more than £500m annually to the Scottish economy, and SNP ministers in Holyrood had sought to keep the “commercially sensitive” data over seal culling secret, but a court victory by the campaigners forced the full disclosure earlier this week.

The documents show that in 2013 and 2014 more than a third of Scotland’s 200 fish farms shot at least one seal, with a total of 173 of the mammals killed under licence.

Marks & Spencer’s Lochmuir range is supplied by Scottish Seafarms
Marks & Spencer’s Lochmuir range is supplied by Scottish Seafarms

Few salmon farms openly disclose which supermarkets and restaurants they supply, but Don Staniford, director of the Global Alliance Against Industrial Aquaculture (Gaaia), which won the ruling under the Freedom of Information Act, told The Independent there are now plans for a series of “zombie seal” protests outside supermarkets, including M&S, and restaurants who “still source from seal-killing salmon farms”.

Gaaia has also written to supermarkets urging a boycott of seal-shooting salmon farms, and to the US Department of Commerce suggesting a ban on imports.

Of the 173 culled seals, 56 were executed by marksmen for Scottish Seafarms, which has been nominated by M&S for a sustainability award in its role as supplier of the Lochmuir range, while Hjaltland Seafarms/Grieg Seafood shot 36, and the Scottish Salmon Company killed 23.

The farm that supplies M&S shot a total of 56 seals 2013-14, more than any other Scottish farm. File photo (Rex)
The farm that supplies M&S shot a total of 56 seals 2013-14, more than any other Scottish farm. File photo (Rex) (Rex Features)

All three firms say they have reduced the number of seals they cull, but few culled seal carcasses are ever recovered and campaigners argue the real number could be far higher. The publication of the data is a victory for campaigners who have accused some salmon farming companies of preferring to shoot seals rather than install costly equipment, such as strengthened anti-predator nets.

A spokesman for Marks & Spencer said: “Neither we nor our salmon farmers have any wish to see seals or any other sea life harmed. We have led the industry on this issue and invested time and money to avoid this happening.”

A spokesman for Scottish Seafarms said: “In rare circumstances an individual seal’s behaviour can present a persistent and significant threat to the welfare of the salmon, which requires us to utilise the licensed removal of the individual seal.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in