Magistrate quits after being suspended for paying a penniless asylum seeker's fine out of his own pocket
Nigel Allcoat said the decision to penalise him for 'a humanitarian act beggars belief'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior magistrate has been suspended after he tried to pay a penniless asylum seeker's court fine.
Nigel Allcoat, 65, from Burbage in Leicestershire, tried to pay part of a £180 criminal courts charge levied on a refugee who appeared before him at Leicester Magistrates' Court three weeks ago.
He said the man in his 20s was ordered to pay the fee in June by another court and had appeared before him as a fine defaulter.
He told the Leicester Mercury: "As an asylum seeker, his papers and situation is still being considered by our country and the immigration officials.
"He has a top-up card of £35 a week to purchase necessities in designated stores.
"When he first appeared in court in June before another bench, a friend who runs a Leicester food stall, who occasionally fed him, paid a £60 victim surcharge on behalf of the asylum seeker. This was a generous and human act and should be applauded."
He explained that the man's inability to pay the fine would mean he would be further criminalised.
As an asylum seeker, he cannot legally earn money and to do so could jeopardise his status as an asylum seeker.
"I was appalled that he should be in such a Catch-22 situation, as whichever way he went he would break the law", Mr Allcoat said.
He explained that his primary job was to prevent reoffending so he decided to pay part of the fine himself.
After his suspension, he resigned in disgust and said to be "taken to task for a humanitarian act beggars belief".
Since the beginning of April, courts have been obliged to impose high court costs in a bid by the Ministry of Justice to reduce costs.
I was appalled that he should be in such a Catch 22 situation, as whichever way he went he would break the law
The move has triggered widespread controversy and has resulted in a judicial revolt with nearly 50 magistrates resigning.
Last week, The Independent revealed that magistrates are using a little known legal convention called "absolute discharge" where a guilty verdict is technically recorded but the court hands out no punishment.
Campaigners have called the fees a "tax on justice" as they encourage people to plead guilty.
Fines are fixed at £150 for guilty pleas but can rise to £1,000 if the matter goes to trial.
In August, a crowd funding campaign raised over £16,000 for a Kidderminster woman who was fined £328.75 for stealing a 75p pack of Mars Bars.
The Scottish campaigner, Stuart Campbell, who set up the campaign told The Independent it was a "small gesture of solidarity" and called her prosecution "grotesque".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments