Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Loyalists under pressure to control Belfast violence

David McKittrick
Thursday 13 June 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Efforts were under way yesterday to persuade loyalist paramilitary groups to back away from the violence which has recently hit a number of areas across Belfast.

Efforts were under way yesterday to persuade loyalist paramilitary groups to back away from the violence which has recently hit a number of areas across Belfast.

The hope is that the main loyalist organisations, the Ulster Volunteer Force and Ulster Defence Association, might agree to a "no first strike" policy at the city's numerous flashpoints. Behind the scenes, talks have been going on for some time in the hope of reducing violence before next month's arrival of the loyalist marching season brings its traditional heightening of tensions.

The talks centre on the Loyalist Commission, a loose umbrella grouping which includes representatives of the paramilitary groups as well as a number of politicians and Protestant clergymen. The Sinn Fein minister Martin McGuinness welcomed the talks and said he applauded attempts by political representatives to stop loyalist attacks.

The continuing violence in north Belfast has recently spread to Short Strand in the east of the city, while there have also been lesser outbreaks in the south. The UVF, which had been comparatively quiet in recent months, has raised its violent profile in the south and east, particularly around the Catholic Short Strand area.

While any declaration to emerge from the talks would be regarded as worthwhile, it would be received with much scepticism, given that some loyalist groups have often broken their word. Nonetheless, almost any potentially positive step would be welcomed in a city which has seen a reduction in the death rate but persistent street disturbances.

The moves come against the umpromising background of numerous night-time attacks, most of them the work of loyalist organisations and individuals. Unusually, the target of one loyalist attack was a Protestant minister, the Reverend Earl Storey, a Church of Ireland rector. Several windows at his home at Glenavy near Belfast, and his car windscreen, were broken.

Mr Storey said he believed he had been targeted because he had recently published a book saying his church should break its ties with loyalist marchers. He added: "It was trying to look in a reasoned way and taking away the passions on the issue of the Church of Ireland and the Orange Order."

A smoke canister was thrown through the window of the home of an elderly Catholic priest not far from Mr Storey's house. In another incident the Carrickfergus, Co Antrim, home of Stewart Dickson, a councillor representing the moderate Alliance party, was damaged by a group of eight masked loyalists who objected to his attempts to have loyalist murals removed.

In Co Down, loyalists carried out a "punishment attack" on a boy, aged 15, on Wednesday, leaving him with a broken leg and suspected broken arm.

Chief Superintendent Judith Gillespie said the boy could be scarred for life, adding: "This was a child, regardless of whether or not he has been involved in any crime. That is not the issue. This is child abuse. He is very upset and traumatised by this experience. While the physical scars may heal, I'm sure he will have long-lasting psychological scars."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in