Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Livingstone: Take down Trafalgar Square's irrelevant generals

Kate Watson-Smyth
Thursday 19 October 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

First it was the pigeons. Now Ken Livingstone has decided that the monumental figures of the generals should also be removed from Trafalgar Square.

First it was the pigeons. Now Ken Livingstone has decided that the monumental figures of the generals should also be removed from Trafalgar Square.

The Mayor of London feels that the stone statues of Major-General Sir Henry Havelock and General Sir Charles James Napier, who distinguished themselves in 19th-century battles on the Asian continent, should be replaced with figures more relevant to modern-day Britons. Or, to put it more simply, they must go because he "hasn't got a clue" who they are.

"In our main square in our capital city the people on the plinth should be identifiable to most of the population. It is time to move those two generals and have figures ordinary Londoners and other people... would know. I haven't got a clue who they are," he said yesterday, only weeks after he banned the feeding of pigeons in the square, leading to accusations that hundreds of them were starving to death.

His remarks were greeted with outrage. Bernard Jenkin, the Tory spokesman on London, called the plan "another example of left-wing politicians trying to bash Britain. Last week, the politically correct left accused the word British of being racially coded. This week Livingstone is trying to erase a fundamental part of our nation's heritage from the heart of our capital city," he said.

Colonel Alistair Cumming, regimental secretary of the Highlanders - to which Havelock belonged - asked: "What business is it of his to remove statues? And where do we stop? Are they planning to rip Nelson off his column?"

It is not the first threat to the generals. In 1950 there was a campaign to replace them with "figures representing a socialist democracy such as railway men, merchant seamen and miners".

Havelock (1795-1857) served in the Burmese and Afghan Wars and in the Indian Mutiny. Napier (1782-1853) fought in the Peninsula War against Napoleon and also in India. Asked who might replace the two men, Mr Livingstone was less sure of himself. "I am not going to venture names at this stage ... we need a period of consultation," he said.

He may, however have bitten off more than he can chew. Those responsible for deciding what should adorn the empty fourth plinth took years to suggest that it should be an ever-changing exhibition. The public consultation threw up hundreds of ideas ranging from the Queen Mother and Red Rum to a 24ft high pigeon - an idea the Mayor would surely veto.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in