Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Popular cold medications don’t work, say experts, as US considers ban

Phenylephrine ‘is extensively broken down in the liver, resulting in little to no pharmacological effect’

Jane Dalton
Friday 08 November 2024 18:46 EST
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A pharmacy drugs expert says many popular cold and flu remedies should be banned because they are a waste of money.

It comes as as the American Food and Drug Administration wants to stop phenylephrine, which is widely used in cough and cold medicines from being sold in the US.

The ingredient is in some of the best-selling remedies such as Sudafed, Benadryl, Lemsip and Beechams.

Hisham Al-Obaidi, a pharmacy lecturer at the University of Reading and an ambulance service advanced pharmacist practitioner, said phenylephrine hydrochloride had minimal activity when taken orally.

“Although it is absorbed into the bloodstream, it is extensively broken down in the liver, resulting in little to no pharmacological effect,” Dr Al-Obaidi said.

He said that by contrast, the nasal spray is effective.

“When phenylephrine is administered nasally, it bypasses the gastrointestinal tract and avoids the first-pass metabolism that occurs with oral administration. This allows higher levels of the drug to act directly on the nasal lining, where it can more effectively constrict blood vessels and relieve congestion.”

The oral version should be dropped because “it has no effect so it shouldn’t really be sold as otherwise it a waste of people’s money”, he said.

In the US, if the FDA’s proposal goes ahead, the tablets and pills would be withdrawn, which would rock the multi-million-dollar industry.

Helen Wall, a GP, agreed that products with phenylephrine in taken by mouth were a waste of money, but said some people find they help relieve symptoms because they contain paracetamol and they are “warm and comforting”.

She added: “It’s what people do when they are ill and it’s part of the process of feeling like they are taking some control of the situation which is beneficial to getting better in most illnesses.

“If it helps, then it’s not a waste of money, I guess.

“Phenylephrine has long since been known as an old drug and I think the evidence for it working orally is scanty.”

Dr Wall said that if consumed regularly, such products may increase blood pressure in some people.

“Personally I use paracetamol, some vitamin C and a nasal decongestant for no more than 7 days when I get a cold and plenty fluids.

“As a medical professional, I think banning them would need to be based on safety concerns as they do seem to help some people.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in