Leeds Bradford Airport: government delays decision on controversial expansion
Plans to increase passenger numbers by 3 million every year would fly in face of country’s commitment to become carbon neutral, opponents say
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A £150 million proposal to transform Leeds Bradford Airport into what would be the north’s second busiest hub has been delayed to allow the government more time to consider it.
Plans to replace the old Sixties terminal with an entirely new building – part of a scheme to accommodate an extra 3 million passengers a year – were approved by Leeds City Council in February.
But the decision was referred to the government amid major concerns that the development – and the resulting pollution – would devastate the UK’s commitment to becoming carbon neutral by 2050.
Now communities secretary Robert Jenrick has said he wants longer to give “proper consideration” to all sides of the debate. A date for a final decision has not been set.
Chris Foren, chair of the opposing Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport, said he was happy the government had paused the plans - but they now needed to be killed off completely.
Read more:
“We’re glad that the secretary of state hasn’t just waved this through without properly considering all the implications that such a development would have,” he told the Independent. “We now urge him to give these plans the scrutiny this deserve because we’re confident, once he does so, it will be absolutely obvious that they are entirely incompatible with the urgent need to decarbonise the economy.
“There are no two ways about it: it would be an environmental disaster for the region and for the country.”
The new terminal was first mooted in 2018 as part of a scheme that would turn Leeds Bradford into the second busiest airport in the north (after Manchester) and the 10th busiest in the country.
The scheme would see the old terminal replaced with a new three-storey, glass-fronted complex enabling up to 17 extra flights a day.
Advocates – and some 1,600 people have signed a petition in favour – say it would build on Boris Johnson’s levelling up agenda by creating an estimated 12,650 jobs and boosting connectivity in an area of West Yorkshire much in need of a post-coronavirus boost. They have also pointed out that the new building itself would be net-zero.
But opponents have included MP and councillors from across the region and political spectrum, as well as residents and environmental groups.
Only on Monday did Leeds Central MP Hilary Benn plead with Mr Jenrick to call-in the plan.
"This one airport plans to emit more CO2 than a number of small countries which are the most vulnerable to climate change,” he wrote in the Yorkshire Post. “While LBA expansion may not be on the scale of Heathrow, the proposal has implications that go way beyond the immediate locality of the airport."
Responding to news of the call-in, a spokesperson for Leeds Bradford Airport said: "We acknowledge the deadline extension and hope the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government will uphold Leeds City Council's approval for our replacement terminal, which will deliver thousands of new jobs and support the region's economy."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments