Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lawyers 'forced Omagh victim to strip at interview'

David McKittrick
Monday 26 August 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A minister has promised to investigate a complaint from a victim of the 1998 Omagh bomb that compensation officials humiliated and degraded her by forcing her to strip to her underwear.

Rosemary Ingram, who is 53, said she was required to remove her clothing so a panel of six lawyers, including three men, could examine the extensive scarring she suffered in the bombing.

Mrs Ingram added: "One of them even pulled at my underwear to see the extent of the scars. They said they wanted to look at how the scars were healing, but that is not the point." The details of her examination have proved disturbing to many, in themselves and because of the enduring emotional damage caused by the Omagh attack, which killed 29 people and injured 200 more.

A Northern Ireland Office spokeswoman said Des Browne, the minister who handles victim issues, was looking into the case, adding: "This is a sensitive and painful issue for all concerned and the greatest possible care is taken in assessing compensation."

Another complaint came from Kevin Skelton. The facial scars of his 16-year-old daughter, Jane, were examined by lawyers. He said one commented to another "that it would be far worse if both sides of her face had been scarred". Mr Skelton added: "She cried when she came home. She was absolutely gutted. It is bad enough having a scar on your face, a young girl of her age, without somebody making sarcastic remarks like that. I was devastated."

Mrs Ingram's brother Stanley McCombe, who lost his wife in the explosion, said his sister said the examination "was so degrading. She had to stand there in her underwear and let these people have a cheap view." Mrs Ingram had shrapnel injuries to her legs, buttock, head and right shoulder.

Sir Kenneth Bloomfield, who chaired a review of criminal injuries compensation and is a former victims commissioner, said: "If a valid medical practitioner is able to produce convincing evidence that the injuries are of a certain kind, it is difficult to see why less qualified people should question that. It is particularly sensitive for women to [be] subjected to this kind of examination."

* A memorial to eight soldiers killed in an IRA bombing 14 years ago was damaged by arsonists, who also scattered wreaths left at the site on the Ballygawley to Omagh road.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in