Lawyers for James Bulger's killers fight to protect their identity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lawyers for the killers of toddler James Bulger are today asking the High Court to maintain the secrecy surrounding them, even though both have now turned 18 and are no longer entitled to automatic protection.
Lawyers for the killers of toddler James Bulger are today asking the High Court to maintain the secrecy surrounding them, even though both have now turned 18 and are no longer entitled to automatic protection.
Jon Venables and Robert Thompson hope to win parole early next year, following a ruling by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf, that they had served the minimum tariff necessary under their life sentences.
The boys, both 10 when they beat two-year-old James to death in February 1993, have served their sentences in secure local authority accommodation and are unlikely to be sent to a young offenders' institution or adult prison.
An interim injunction, granted in July, bans the media from taking or publishing photographs of them or reporting on their progress.
Both are believed to be terrified at the prospect of being thrown into the media spotlight.
Today's move to continue the injunction was being contested by media organisations.
In a hearing set for three days, Family Division President Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss is facing the task of balancing the youths' right to privacy and family life under the European Human Rights Convention and the Human Rights Act against the media's right to freedom of expression.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments