Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Jury out in inflatable sculpture death trial

Cordelia O'Neill,Press Association
Monday 23 February 2009 11:41 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The jury was sent out today in the manslaughter trial of an artist whose inflatable sculpture blew away, killing two women inside.

Maurice Agis, 77, denies killing Claire Furmedge, 38, and Elizabeth Collings, 68, by gross negligence when his walk-in Dreamspace exhibit flipped into the air on a sunny day in July 2006 at the Riverside Park in Chester-le-Street, County Durham.

As the trial at Newcastle Crown Court enters its fourth week, Mrs Justice Cox sent the jury of six men and six women out to consider its verdicts.

Agis, of Kirton Gardens, Bethnal Green, east London, also denies breaching the Health and Safety at Work Act, in relation to staff employed at the site.

During the trial, the prosecution alleged Agis did not properly anchor the structure, which was on a national tour.

Paul Sloan QC, prosecuting, said: "The defendant's conduct was so bad in all the circumstances, having regard to the risk of death involved if the structure broke free from its moorings, that it can only be categorised as gross negligence and therefore amounting to manslaughter."

The artist did not give evidence, and no defence witnesses were called.

His barrister, Timothy Langdale QC, told the jury the artist "did not want this to happen, was not looking for it to happen, and he was not expecting it to happen".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in