Juror who posted paedophile trial on Facebook denies contempt of court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The modern-day perils of using the internet while serving on a jury were all too evident today as two former jurors were brought before the High Court.
One is accused on commenting about the case he was trying on Facebook, while the other is said to have used Google to research evidence. Both could face jail terms if found guilty of contempt of court.
New jurors are warned, both prior to joining a jury and by the judge at the onset of a trial, that it is their solemn duty to only assess the case on the evidence before them in court and not to comment to outsiders.
The gravity with which the courts take such cases was evident as the matter came before Sir John Thomas, president of the Queen's Bench Division. The Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC was prosecuting, seeking an order of committal against both men, who deny carrying out "an act likely to interfere with the administration of justice".
In one case, the High Court heard how Kasim Davey, 21, "spontaneously" wrote a Facebook message after being surprised at finding himself trying a sex offender in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal.
It read: "Woooow I wasn't expecting to be in a jury Deciding a paedophile's fate, I've always wanted to F*** up a paedophile & now I'm within the law!"
A judge at Wood Green Crown Court, north London, was alerted to the message last December and discharged Mr Davey from the retrial of Adam Kephalas, who was later convicted of sexual activity with a child.
Asked by his counsel, Lord Carlile QC, why he had made the posting, Mr Davey said: "It was spontaneous surprise at the kind of case I was on - there was a lot of Jimmy Savile news at the time".
He admitted he was just trying to "attract attention", insisting he had no intention of prejudicing the case and had been considering the evidence carefully before being discharged.
"I didn't understand the implications. As far as I knew it was a general statement without naming anyone," he added.
The second case involved Joseph Beard, 29, who sat on a jury at Kingston Crown Court in south west London trying two men accused of conspiracy to defraud and money laundering last year. The trial, which began on 2 October 2012, collapsed five weeks later when the jury was discharged.
Beard is alleged to have researched extra information about victims of the alleged fraud on Google before telling fellow jurors.
Today, he insisted that he had simply been using the internet to assess how long the trial was going to last as he was under pressure to return to work. He denied infuriating fellow jurors by passing on evidence they had not heard in court.
The defendants, Ian Macdonald and David Downes, were later jailed for eight years and four-and-a-half years respectively after a retrial earlier this year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments