Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Two junior doctors left to care for more than 400 patients in one night, report reveals

Doctor raised concerns, saying the situation was "very unsafe" from the patients' perspective

Alexandra Britton
Monday 18 September 2017 18:22 EDT
Comments
Plymouth Hospital Trust said issue raised was 'not the norm'
Plymouth Hospital Trust said issue raised was 'not the norm' (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Two junior doctors were left to care for more than 400 patients at a Plymouth hospital during a night shift, a report has revealed.

The pressures on staffing at the Derriford Hospital came to light in an anonymous concern raised by a doctor who said the situation was a "very unsafe shift from the patient perspective".

The report was published as part of the Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust board papers from July, and said the doctor was pulled from a breast surgery day job at 11am to be asked to cover medical nights.

The issue was raised on May 23, and the report said: "Told on the phone that the deputy medical director had talked to my consultant and said I must do this, as there would otherwise only be a single SHO (senior house officer) looking after all of the medical patients in the hospital.

"After discussion with my consultant we reluctantly agreed that the best measure from a patient safety perspective would be for me to attend this shift, despite it being unsafe and bad for my personal training/development. Unfortunately, I did not manage much sleep before coming in for the night due to the short notice.

"Between myself and the other SHO on ward cover we were responsible for the care of 436 patients between the two of us, while carrying the crash bleep which covers the whole hospital."

Other staff on the ward included one doctor, and two senior house officers and a house officer - known as an F1 - working in the medical assessment unit.

The report concluded: "(We) want it to be noted while having done our best; this was a very unsafe shift from the patient perspective."

Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust said the paper detailed what it referred to as "exception reporting" meaning these issues were not the norm.

It added it takes the issues of staffing and doctor recruitment seriously and is working to improve the situation.

Press Association

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in