Judges call for human rights reform
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two of Britain's most senior judges yesterday added their voices to calls for reform of the European Court of Human Rights.
The UK is planning to use its six-month chairmanship of the Council of Europe, which began this month, to push the case for reform to make the Court more efficient.
A key issue is reducing the backlog of cases which its 46 judges have to deal with. Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge – the head of the judiciary in England and Wales – told a parliamentary committee that applicants should be required to obtain permission to go to Strasbourg and cases should have a genuine human rights issue at stake. It should not just be a means to challenge a national court's judgment.
Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, told the Joint Committee on Human Rights: "I agree with the basic point being made by Lord Judge. What they ought to be focusing on is cases which raise issues of principle."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments