Jewels in deposit box vanished after Mrs Fayed showed interest, court told
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A fortune in antique jewels kept in a Harrods safety deposit box disappeared after the wife of the department store's owner, Mohamed Al Fayed, "showed interest in them", the High Court was told yesterday.
The allegation came on the first day of Mr Fayed's damages action for alleged false imprisonment against Scotland Yard detectives investigating the theft and criminal damage of a Harrods safety deposit box belonging to the late businessman Tiny Rowland in 1995.
The High Court was told that Bob Loftus, a former director of security at Harrods, had disclosed another case in which a safety deposit box belonging to Helga Schwarzschild was opened for alleged non-payment of rental fees. Her jewellery allegedly went missing on being taken to Mr Fayed's office, after his wife, Heini, had "shown interest". When a private investigator hired by Ms Schwarzschild contacted Harrods, store officials said they had "no idea" of the jewels' whereabouts, the court was told.
Stephen Miller QC, for the police, said evidence "amply demonstrated" that there were reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Fayed and four associates had committed an offence. Mr Rowland's deposit box was broken into and valuable contents, including emeralds, were stolen.
Mr Fayed and four other current and former employees – John Macnamara, Paul Handley-Greaves, Colin Dalman and John Allen – are claiming damages from the Metropolitan Police Commissioner over alleged false imprisonment in March 1998 during the Rowland investigation.
Their counsel, Ian Croxford QC, told Mr Justice Cresswell, sitting without a jury, that it was "irrelevant" whether Mr Fayed and his associates were a party to opening Mr Rowland's box. Their case was based on whether the police had reasonable grounds to suspect an arrestable offence. The hearing continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments