Police officers who shot dead Jean Charles de Menezes 'should not be prosecuted', rules ECHR
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UK was right not to charge any police officers over the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes, an electrician who they thought was a suicide bomber, in 2005.
Prosecutors dropped the case after an investigation because it was decided there was insufficient evidence for the “realistic prospect” of convicting any one officer over the killing.
The Brazilian man’s family took their fight for justice over the shooting to the European Court of Human Rights, but judges have now ruled against them by 13 votes to four.
Mr De Menezes was shot seven times in the head by firearms officers as he boarded a train at Stockwell Tube station in south London on 22 July, 11 years ago.
Lawyers for the family had argued the decision not to prosecution anyone over the shooting was in violation of Mr De Menezes’ right to life, under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
They also challenged the definition of self-defence used by British authorities in the case.
In a ruling, judges in Strasbourg concluded there had been a thorough investigation into Mr De Menezes’ death, which “concluded that there was insufficient evidence against any individual officer to prosecute”.
They found that the Crown Prosecution Service was not obligated to lower the evidence threshold under human rights laws where the state was involved in the killing.
“The decision not to prosecute any individual officer was not due to any failings in the investigation or the State’s tolerance of or collusion in unlawful acts,” the court said.
The decision by Europe’s highest human rights court brings to an end an 11-year legal saga which saw the police’s account of events rejected at an inquest.
Mr De Menezes was killed by officers hunting for the perpetrators of a failed suicide bomb attack in London the day before. The incident came two weeks after the deadly 7/7 bombings.
The CPS announced in 2006 that no individual would be charged over the killing of the 27-year-old.
The following year the Metropolitan Police was fined £175,000 under health and safety laws.
At an inquest, the coroner ruled out a verdict of unlawful killing – but also rejected the police account. An open verdict was eventually returned.
In 2009, the family of the electrician agreed an undisclosed settlement with Scotland Yard.
The original application to the ECHR was lodged by Mr De Menezes’ cousin on 21 January 2008, more than eight years ago. A hearing took place in the ECHR's Grand Chamber in June last year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments