James Bulger’s mother hits out at ‘disgusting’ AI videos of murdered son
Denise Fergus called the AI-generated videos of her murdered toddler “beyond sick”
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The mother of murdered toddler James Bulger has criticised AI-generated videos of her dead son circulating on TikTok.
The two-year-old was kidnapped from New Strand Shopping Centre in 1993 and tortured and killed by two 10-year-old boys, Robert Thompson and Jon Venables.
Denise Fergus said the videos, which depict an AI image of James explaining the events of his notorious murder, were forcing her to relive the events of his brutal murder.
She told The Mirror: “It is bringing a dead child back to life. It is beyond sick.”
One video included a photograph of a railway line where his body was found two days after his abduction.
Mrs Fergus said: “It is one thing to tell the story, I have not got a problem with that. Everyone knows the story of James anyway.
“But to actually put a dead child’s face, speaking about what happened to him, is absolutely disgusting.”
Her husband Stuart Fergus said he’d asked the person responsible for the clips to take them down, but the producer of the video replied saying their intention was not to offend, but to “make sure incidents will never happen again to anyone”.
TikTok has since removed several videos after they were reported and is said to have taken measures against the accounts responsible for posting them.
The video app added in a statement: “We want TikTok to be a welcoming place for everyone, and there is no place on our platform for disturbing content of this nature.
“Our Community Guidelines are clear that we do not allow synthetic media that contains the likeness of a young person.
“We continue to remove content of this nature as we find it.”
The AI technology used to create the videos has caused copyright and privacy concerns given that it works by using public data.
Just last month, Queen’s University in Belfast warned that the lack of data protection laws in the UK could lead to ”ghostbots”, a term which describes when AI is used to create digital reincarnations of the dead.
In March, the UK decided against creating a new body dedicated to regulating artificial intelligence, while the EU has drafted the world’s first-ever law to regulate the industry.
The UK instead chose to split the responsibility between the bodies that oversee human rights, health and safety, and competition.
The Competition and Markets Authority said it would seek to understand how models that use large amounts of unlabelled data were developing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments