Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'I won't quit,' says Nicholas Scott

Paul Routledge
Saturday 21 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

(First Edition)

NICHOLAS SCOTT, the minister who talked out a backbench Bill to extend the civil rights of the disabled 'because it would cost too much', yesterday brushed aside calls for him to quit, writes Paul Routledge.

Asked if he would resign, he said: 'As long as I have the confidence of the Prime Minister and my colleagues, certainly not. I have enjoyed doing my job as minister for disabled people for the past seven years.'

Downing Street has indicated that Mr Scott has the full support of John Major, who sanctioned the parliamentary manoeuvring that killed off the Civil Rights (Disabled Persons) Bill last Friday.

Roger Berry, Labour MP for Kingswood, who was the Bill's sponsor, asked: 'How much has a minister got to mislead the House of Commons before he is asked to resign?'

Mr Scott repeated the Government's objections to the Bill: that it would cost industry pounds 17bn immediately and then pounds 1bn a year.

'However sympathetic one is, you cannot impose that sort of cost on British business and industry without having widespread consultation with them on the impact that it is likely to have on their operation.'

The Government has promised to bring forward its own proposals for tackling discrimination following six months of public consultation. These include measures to tackle job discrimination, access to buildings and services, and formation of a national advisory body.

'This is a package of measures which will be practical, affordable and workable, and will make a great deal of difference to the status and lives of disabled people,' Mr Scott said.

But powerful voices in the disabled lobby - including Mr Scott's own daughter - continue to press for his resignation.

Jane Campbell, of the British Council of Organisations of Disabled People, said: 'We've completely lost faith. We cannot do business with this man.'

Mr Scott's daughter, Victoria, who is parliamentary officer for Radar, a charity for the disabled, has also criticised his role in helping kill off the Bill.

Earlier this month Mr Scott admitted misleading the House of Commons about his department's role in preparing a series of Conservative backbench amendments aimed at wrecking the Bill's chances.

Groups representing Britain's 6.5 million disabled people called for Mr Scott to resign.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in