Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

How to spend it like the Queen? Try a £1m asbestos bill

Accounts show Royal family cost us more last year – led by vast repair bill for Buckingham Palace

Martin Hickman
Tuesday 03 July 2012 04:09 EDT
Comments
The Queen’s expenditure has fallen since 2009, allowing her advisers to boast about frugality
The Queen’s expenditure has fallen since 2009, allowing her advisers to boast about frugality (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Queen is facing a multi-million pound bill for removing potentially deadly asbestos from Buckingham Palace. Almost £1m of public money has already been spent stripping asbestos from electrical cabling ducts under flooring in the south wing of the 19th-century building, royal accounts revealed yesterday.

Further work to remove the building material from other parts of the palace will take place over 20 years, with the total bill for ensuring the Royals and courtiers avoid developing mesothelioma – a malignant lung cancer caused by inhaling asbestos – coming to several millions of pounds.

A rolling programme has begun to update electrical cabling at the palace laid in the late-1940s. Hidden within last year's accounts was the warning that replacing existing heating and electrical pipes at Buckingham Palace "with associated asbestos removal will now take 15-20 years to complete".

The latest accounts – which showed that taxpayer funding for the Queen rose slightly by 0.6 per cent, or £200,000, to £32.3m in the year to April – revealed that tearing out asbestos from under lino in the south wing cost £800,000.

The accounts noted: "The mechanical and electrical services at Buckingham Palace were largely installed in 1949 and are in need of replacement. The mains are distributed around the palace from central plant rooms in ducts that run under the basement floor of three of the four wings. This... comprises the removal of the cover of each duct, clearance of asbestos contamination…"

A spokesman for the Royal Household said "extensive records" were kept to ensure that maintenance workers were safe from asbestos when carrying out repairs.

The Royal Family has a backlog of essential building work, including repairs to crumbling roof masonry. Last year £9.7m of government grant-in-aid was pumped into renovating Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, St James's Palace and other buildings, up from £7.8m the previous year.

Public funding for royal travel rose by £100,000 to £6.1m, which covered the chartering of planes and helicopters. The Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall's travel bill was the highest, costing at least £810,000, followed by the Duke of York on £378,249.

Despite the rise, the Queen's spending has dropped since 2009, allowing Buckingham Palace to point to her frugalness. The savings have allowed the Queen to channel £3m into reserves – which she will use to pay for her Diamond Jubilee celebrations.

Sir Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse, said: "When the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced his plans for the public expenditure to reduce by 25 per cent in real terms over a four-year period, the Queen was very keen that the Royal Household should play its part in reducing its expenditure accordingly."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in