How free vote led to divorce defeat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Long before last week's Commons vote on ending the concept of fault in divorce, the Government had hoisted the white flag.
Aware that the proposals from Lord Mackay, the Lord Chancellor, faced stiff opposition, John Major announced last year that there would be a free vote. In the event there was an unexpected defeat for the Government on the proposed cooling- off period and a narrow victory on the measure itself. There was no attempt to whip Conservative MPs to back the Government's proposals - indeed five whips voted against no-fault divorces. Yet the scale of the vote against surprised almost everyone.
The objectors fall into several categories:
1) The campaigners. Includes a number of Roman Catholics, including former Secretary of State for Education John Patten, Ann Widdecombe, Minister of State at the Home Office, and Edward Leigh, former junior Trade and Industry minister. Mr Leigh acted as Commons campaign organiser.
2) The older generation. Dame Jill Knight, who described herself as a "most loyal backbencher" of 30 years' standing, parted company with the Government on this issue. She and Michael Jopling, a former chief whip, are instinctive opponents of anything smacking of permissiveness.
3) Big-hitters and political gesture-makers. All the Cabinet ministers who voted against were aware that their votes would be scrutinised. Three right-wing Cabinet ministers, Michael Howard, Peter Lilley and William Hague, will have had an eye on the right-of-centre of the party in making their decision. Mr Howard's move was particularly embarrassing for the Government since he will have been consulted about the Bill when it was framed. Stephen Dorrell, leading left-winger and potential leadership contender, may also have seen some political advantage in wooing the Right.
4) "MPs of the family". Almost all Conservatives see themselves as the party of the family. Many worry about links between family break- up and rising levels of crime and drug-taking.
Little noticed among the rumpus was that on this contentious division only 396 MPs bothered to vote at all.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments