Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Home Office bail blunder led to father being ordered back to jail for 11 more days

Exclusive: Ministers accused of showing ‘deep lack of attention and care’ after father-of-six forced to leave children days after being reunited with them due to blunder by immigration authorities

May Bulman
Social Affairs Correspondent
Thursday 17 December 2020 14:54 EST
Comments
Nicardo Stewart said his children were ‘so happy’ when he came home - but that he would now have to ‘let them down’ and spend Christmas away from them
Nicardo Stewart said his children were ‘so happy’ when he came home - but that he would now have to ‘let them down’ and spend Christmas away from them (Supplied)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Home Office error meant a man was released and told he had completed his prison sentence – only to be ordered back to jail to spend 11 more days behind bars.

Nicardo Stewart, 36, was released on bail from removal centre Brook House on Monday, where he had spent four weeks after being detained for deportation to Jamaica last month. His removal was cancelled a week before the flight on the grounds that he has strong family ties to the UK.

The Jamaican national returned home to his partner and children – all aged between six and 12 – and the family had been looking forward to spending Christmas together.

However, Mr Stewart, who served a three-year sentence for possession of an offensive weapon before being placed in immigration detention, was contacted by the probation services on Thursday and told he must return to custody to serve the remaining 11 days of his custodial sentence.

An email from the head of offender management services at the jail where he served his sentence explained that immigration services had wrongly released Mr Stewart on bail.

“This was done wrongly by immigration as you were still a serving offender and hadn’t completed your sentence in custody," the email said. 

Mr Stewart told The Independent he was devastated at being ripped apart from his family days after being reunited with them, and said the situation was leading him to have suicidal thoughts.

“I don’t know how I’m going to explain that to my kids. I told them I would be there for Christmas. They were so happy when I came back on Monday, and now if I go back to jail I’m going to let them down again. They were all looking forward to us being together for Christmas,” he said.

Celia Clarke, director at Bail for Immigration Detainees, said the case showed a “deep lack of attention and care” and was “deeply cruel” on Mr Stewart and his children.  

“To be reunited with your parent after so long only to have him snatched away and returned to prison is an unimaginable level of cruelty. And all because of what seems to be some kind of bureaucratic error,” she added.

“Can someone not deploy some common-sense and humanity and allow him to serve the 11 days with his family?”

Mr Stewart was one of 35 Jamaican nationals who were taken off a controversial deportation flight that departed from the UK on 2 December following legal intervention. 

The majority of claims were made on the grounds that they had strong familial ties in the UK – as in the case of Mr Stewart – or they had trafficking indicators.

The Home Office was urged following the flight to ensure people facing deportation have adequate access to legal advice prior to their removal, amid claims by immigration minister Chris Philp that the lawyers who intervened in their cases had used “last-minute tactics”.

The Home Office has been approached for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in