Home Office challenged in court for ‘wrongly trying to deport highly skilled migrants’
Hundreds refused UK status under law designed to remove people who pose threat to national security
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Home Office is to be challenged in court over its decision to strip hundreds of highly skilled migrants of their UK status under a section of immigration law designed to remove people who pose a threat to national security.
Ministers admitted in November that at least 300 highly skilled workers – including teachers, doctors, lawyers, engineers and IT professionals – have been wrongly told to leave Britain for making minor and legal amendments to their tax records.
Now campaigners are going to argue in the Court of Appeal that the Home Office has been misusing a law, known as Section 322(5), which forces migrants to leave the country due to their “conduct, character or associations or the fact that [they] represent a threat to national security”.
A government review of the 322(5) provision, published in November, suggested up to 87 highly skilled migrants have been wrongly forced to leave the UK under terrorism-related legislation.
The test case is being brought by Migrant Rights Network. A petition demanding home secretary Sajid Javid stops “abusing the national security clause to deport highly skilled migrants”, has garnered almost 100,000 signatures.
One Pakistani man, who asked not to be named, said his life had been “turned upside down” since he was refused leave to remain in 2017 under the clause. He has since appealed the refusal and was granted UK status in August 2018, but while waiting for his hearing he was prevented from working, pushing him into debt.
The 38-year-old, who has been in Britain for 12 years and is a single parent to a severely autistic eight-year-old child, had been working for the civil service as an IT trainer for seven years, but when his application was rejected he lost his right to work.
He said he has had to pay around £35,000 in application fees and legal fees to fight the refusal. He has not been allowed to work for more than a year, and when he was granted leave to remain he was told his vacancy had been filled so is still looking for work.
“We have been through so much over these two years, and it was all because of that wrong decision the Home Office made,” he said. “Now I have been granted indefinite leave to remain, but the damage it’s caused for my family is irreversible.
“My life is not back to normal – I don’t know when it will come back to normal. My life has been ruined and there are potentially so many others out there who are in this situation.”
The issue has also impacted on highly skilled migrants who, as a result of the issue, have been left waiting years for their applications to be decided on.
Mushtaque Shah and his wife Sehar, both Pakistani nationals who have lived in the UK for 12 years and have two British-born daughters, one of whom was born recently, were unable to visit terminally ill relatives before they died because the Home Office is still holding their passports after two and a half years.
The couple, who live in Newcastle, say the uncertainty surrounding their right to be in the UK has made it a difficult time.
“Having a child should be a happy time, but we are just so stressed and everything is so uncertain. No family should go through what we’ve been through,” he said.
“The system has lost credibility, it is not working. It’s meant to take at the most six months to decide on a case – in May it will be three years that we’ve been waiting. We have lost three years of our lives.”
Salman Faruqi, from Highly Skilled UK, a support group intervening in the case along with Migrant Rights Network, said they were aware of around 400 people who have been refused the right to remain for minor tax errors.
“This has impacted hundreds of families, some with disabled children and wives. These people, who were earning around £50,000 or £60,000, are now relying on food banks. They don’t have right to work, right to rent. On a daily basis we see these cases, and we can’t do anything to help them,” he said.
Afzal Khan, Labour’s shadow immigration minister and MP for Manchester Gorton, said: “The awful hostile environment, which led to the Windrush crisis, is now hitting highly skilled migrants.
“I have met doctors, teachers and engineers who have done nothing wrong, but are caught up in the government’s hostile approach to migrants. Our economy and public services rely on highly skilled migrants. We should be welcoming them, not subjecting them to such injustices.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “As legal proceedings are ongoing, it would be inappropriate to comment.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments