High Court to rule on football debts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The High Court is to be asked to decide whether league rules governing the way football clubs clear debts are fair.
Critics say rules operated by the Premier League and the Football League mean that certain creditors are given preferential treatment when clubs get into financial difficulties.
They say the rules mean that creditors from the world of football go to the head of the queue and get paid in full while creditors not involved in football have to share the remainder and can be forced to settle for a fraction of what they are owed.
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) - often a creditor when clubs become insolvent - has taken legal action against the two leagues in an attempt to force rule changes.
Mr Justice Newey heard legal argument about the case during a High Court hearing in London today.
The judge said HMRC's claim against the Football League would be tried at the High Court in London on November 28. He said the Premier League would also be represented at the trial.
Gregory Mitchell QC, for HMRC, told the judge that it was important for the High Court to make a ruling about the legality of the "football creditors' rule" after hearing arguments from HMRC and the leagues.
He said the HMRC would argue that the "rule" was unlawful and that all creditors should be treated in the same way.
Both leagues dispute the HMRC's claims and argue that their rules are fair.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments