Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

G20 pathologist is suspended

Lauren Turner
Friday 03 September 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The pathologist who carried out the first post-mortem examination on the newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson, who died at the G20 protest last year, has been suspended from the medical register for three months.

A General Medical Council disciplinary panel had previously ruled that Dr Freddy Patel had acted in a way that amounted to misconduct in two earlier post-mortems, meaning his fitness to practise was impaired. It also ruled that he had displayed deficient professional performance in a third post-mortem.

He has already been suspended from the Home Office register of forensic pathologists after questions were asked about the autopsy he carried out on the body of 47-year-old Mr Tomlinson.

The panel had already concluded that Dr Patel had failed to meet professional standards when examining the bodies of a five-year-old girl in 2002, a four-week-old baby in 2003 and a woman who died in 2005.

Dr Patel, 63, had behaved "irresponsibly", failed to meet the standards expected of a Home Office pathologist and acted in a way liable to bring the profession into disrepute when he changed the woman's cause of death in 2005, the panel found.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in