Forensic mistake 'possible' in Sarah evidence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior forensic scientist admitted in court yesterday that a sweatshirt, which provided a crucial connection between Sarah Payne and her alleged killer, could have been contaminated.
A single blonde hair that provided an exact DNA match with the eight-year-old could have been transferred by mistake to the garment by forensic scientists at their London laboratories, Lewes Crown Court heard.
The sweatshirt, found in the van of unemployed mechanic Roy Whiting, was among a batch of 55 items transferred by police in sealed bags to the Forensic Science Service in Lambeth, south London.
Bags containing two hairbrushes from the Payne household were among them but forensic scientist Raymond Chapman discovered a number of human and animal hairs had become stuck to the sticky labels on the bags. One of the hairs was similar to the one found on the sweatshirt and, when it was examined by scientists, was found to have come from Sarah's younger sister Charlotte, now aged six.
During cross-examination by Sally O'Neill QC, for the defence, Mr Chapman conceded that it was "a possibility" that one of Sarah's hairs could also have been on the sticky label, fallen off and ended up on the sweatshirt. But he told the jury of nine men and three women: "It's not a great possibility."
The court was told that Whiting's white van was seized on 2 July last year, the day after Sarah disappeared from a lane in East Preston, West Sussex.
The sweatshirt inside was put in a bag after being photographed and examined under special lights but the hair was not spotted.
Whiting, 42, of Littlehampton, West Sussex, denies kidnap and murder. The case continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments