Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Female soldiers should no longer be banned from serving in combat roles, says review

Exclusive: Around 10 per cent of the UK’s total armed forces are women

Tom McTague
Political Editor
Saturday 28 November 2015 17:45 EST
Comments
British female troops share a joke aat Kandahar airfield in Afghanistan
British female troops share a joke aat Kandahar airfield in Afghanistan (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Female soldiers should no longer be banned from serving in combat roles in the military, an official government review has ruled.

The Defence Secretary, Michael Fallon, announced last year that the Government was considering reversing the ban on women serving in the infantry. He said he hoped to “open up combat roles to women” but called for more research to assess whether female service personnel could cope with the physical demands involved.

However, the review has now concluded that “in principle, there is no reason why [women] should not be able to undertake the full range of combat roles”.

The finding, buried in the Government’s long-awaited Strategic Defence and Security Review, opens up the possibility of women serving in the most challenging front-line fighting units from next year. The decision will be confirmed in the new year but it is all but certain that the historic ban will be lifted.

Currently women can serve on the front line, but not where the primary aim is to “close with and kill the enemy”.

Female Junior soldiers from 19 Platoon in Harrogate
Female Junior soldiers from 19 Platoon in Harrogate (Getty)

This means women are not permitted to serve in the infantry or armoured corps.

Previously Mr Fallon said he was confident allowing women in combat roles would not affect the “cohesion of the unit [or] the overall effectiveness of the unit” in battle. He said: “Women can fight just as effectively as men.”

To join an infantry unit at recruitment level, men have to complete a run of 1.5 miles in 12 minutes 45 seconds. They then have to complete an annual fitness assessment which involves carrying 25kg, plus a rifle and helmet, over a distance of just under eight miles in two hours, the Ministry of Defence said.

Women remain excluded from the Infantry, Armoured Corps, Royal Marines and RAF Regiment

Around 10 per cent of the UK’s total armed forces are women, compared to more than 14 per cent in the US and Australia.

More than 20 nations allow women to fight in combat roles, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, and the US.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in