Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Fathers did not have fair trial

 

Tuesday 30 October 2012 21:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Two fathers given suspended jail terms for not paying child support yesterday won legal fights after complaining that their human rights were breached.

Both said procedures adopted by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission – formerly the Child Support Agency – did not comply with their rights to a fair trial. The Court of Appeal ruled in their favour, with judges saying the procedures were flawed and calling on the commission to make changes urgently.

They said the burden of proof was "upside down" because defendants had to "show cause" why they should not be jailed.

A spokesperson for the Department for Work and Pensions said: "It is extremely disappointing that parents who have flouted their legal responsibility to financially support their children have invoked the Human Rights Act to seek to continue to do so. Regrettably, we need every enforcement measure at our disposal to ensure the minority of irresponsible parents pay for their children.

"It is important to stress that this judgement does not question the legality of bringing parents who repeatedly refuse to pay for their children to the attention of magistrates, who can then decide whether to send them to prison. We will of course consider any other implications of this judgement carefully and take the appropriate action."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in