Failed asylum-seekers face deportation back to Zimbabwe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Thousands of failed Zimbabwean asylum-seekers face deportation back to their home country despite reports of human rights abuses by the Mugabe regime.
The move comes after asylum judges ruled there was no evidence that those being returned would generally be at risk of harm.
Last night, the UK Border Agency announced that Britain would resume the forcible return of Zimbabweans whose asylum claims have been rejected.
More than 10,000 Zimbabwean failed asylum-seekers are believed to be in Britain, some 3,000 of whom have exhausted all avenues of appeal. The move will be strongly resisted by human rights groups, which have consistently warned of harassment and persecution of opponents of Robert Mugabe's Zanu-PF party.
Amnesty International UK has warned that resumption of returns would be "premature", while the Refugee Council said it was "concerned" about the move. Last night the Zimbabwe Association urged asylum-seekers in Britain not to panic over the ruling and to wait for further advice.
The UKBA said last night that cases would be considered "on their individual merits and with enormous care". Matthew Coats, head of immigration, said: "We prefer people who are here illegally to leave voluntarily... for those who choose not to do so, it becomes necessary to enforce their departure."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments