Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Citizens from the European Union (EU) have won the right to challenge a law which prevents people from accessing immigration data held on them by Home Office and other state bodies.
Permission to bring a judicial review against the government over a clause in last year’s Data Protection Act, has been granted to campaign group the3million, which represents EU citizens living in the UK, and privacy advocates, the Open Rights Group.
Currently, the “immigration exemption” in the Act means EU citizens who have dealings with the Home Office about their immigration status, are barred from accessing the personal data the department holds on them.
Other state bodies and several companies who are concerned with “immigration control” such as those seeking refuge in the UK, are also exempt.
However, after the High Court ruled ruled the groups could seek a judicial review, the3million will launch a legal challenge against the law.
The will claim the exemption is incompatible with the EU’s new data regulations known as GDPR.
The issue is particularly acute for EU citizens, who will soon have to apply for the new “settled status” to remain living in Britain after the UK leaves the 27 nation bloc.
The3million said EU citizens needed the right to access their Home Office data to be able to challenge any mistakes made and prevent wrongful deportations.
In 2017, the chief inspector of borders and immigration found the department had made the wrong decision in immigration status checks – needed to do things like open a bank account – in 10 per cent of cases.
Last year the Law Society said almost half of immigration decisions which are appealed are overturned which it said was “clear evidence of [the] serious flaws” in the Home Office’s procedures.
“If over three million EU citizens are going to apply for settled status, they must be able to do so knowing it’s safe for them to do it, with the right to see what the Home Office is doing with their data,” said Nicolas Hatton from the3million.
“I am confident our case against the Government will be successful.”
The immigration exemption in the Data Protection Act not only affects EU citizens but also prevents people from elsewhere who live in Britain from accessing their Home Office data.
Matthew Rice from the Open Rights Group said he was delighted to be given permission to bring a judicial review.
“This is about more than those undergoing the settled status checks,” he said.
“This challenge is for anyone and everyone that is going through, or is connected to someone going through, the immigration process. This blunt instrument poses a huge threat to the right to privacy, it is time for it to go once and for all.”
When asked to comment, a spokesman for the Home Office said: “It would be inappropriate to comment on ongoing legal proceedings”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments