Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Demands for inquiry into Iraq torture claims

Law Editor,Robert Verkaik
Tuesday 06 July 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Claims that more than one hundred Iraqi civilians were tortured and abused by British soldiers must be fully investigated at an independent public inquiry, the High Court was told yesterday.

The allegations, made between 2003 and 2009, include cases of murder, electric shock, torture and sexual abuse at 14 UK-run detention centres in Iraq. Michael Fordham QC, for the Iraqis, told the judges that it was now clear that there were "systemic" failures that need to be investigated about the treatment of detainees.

"There are lessons to be learnt about what happened, at whose hands and by whose authority," said Mr Fordham, who has been instructed in the case by Birmingham-based solicitors Public Interest Lawyers. In their skeleton argument, the lawyers said the allegations of mistreatment of Iraqis to be considered by an inquiry should include banned Army techniques, such as hooding, which had become so widely tolerated that they are "implicitly sanctioned" by the Ministry of Defence.

In reply, the Government has told Sir Anthony May and Mr Justice Silber that the 102 claims can be property dealt with by the newly established Iraq Historical Allegations Team (IHAT). But the IHAT will only investigate allegations of criminal misconduct by individual members of UK forces and will not address the alleged systemic abuses so that lessons could be learnt for the future, argued Mr Fordham. The case continues.

In a separate development yesterday, the Government gave way to calls for an inquiry into allegations that British intelligence staff were complicit in the torture of terror suspects held abroad.

David Cameron told MPs the Government would also offer compensation to those wrongly held at Guantanamo Bay. In a Commons statement, the Prime Minister gave details of new guidance for intelligence and military personnel on how to deal with detainees held by other countries, making clear they must never take any action where they know or believe torture will occur.

Mr Cameron said the allegations about mistreatment had "overshadowed" the reputation of the security services. But the inquiry, to be chaired by the intelligence services commissioner Sir Peter Gibson, will not be a full public inquiry, although some of its hearings will be in public.

Gareth Peirce, the solicitor representing many of the former British Guantanamo inmates, said last night: "When the state has been involved in wrongdoing, there is in the public interest an absolute necessity for openness and completeness in facing up honestly to what has been done.

Shami Chakrabarti, the director of Liberty, said: "The Prime Ministerial statement leaves room for considerable anxiety about the adequacy of the new Government's proposed model."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in