Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Subpostmistress wrongly jailed while pregnant rejects apology by ex-Post Office manager

Seema Misra began running a Post Office in 2005, but was suspended after being accused of stealing £74,000

Josh Payne
Friday 12 April 2024 00:39 EDT
Post Office ‘beyond saving’, campaigning subpostmaster Alan Bates says

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A subpostmistress, who was wrongly jailedwhile she was eight weeks pregnant, has rejected an apology by a former managing director of the Post Office who appeared to celebrate her conviction.

Ms Misra told the BBC: “How can I accept the apology? They need to apologise to my 10 year old, they took his mum away on his birthday.

“I was eight weeks pregnant – they need to apologise to my youngest son. It was terrible. I haven’t accepted the apologies.”

Mrs Misra began running a Post Office in West Byfleet in 2005, but was suspended in 2008 after being accused of stealing £74,000
Mrs Misra began running a Post Office in West Byfleet in 2005, but was suspended in 2008 after being accused of stealing £74,000 (PA Archive)

David Smith told the Horizon IT inquiry he acknowledged the “substantial distress” he had caused after telling the Post Office staff the result of Seema Misra’s trial was “brilliant news”.

The former managing director of the Post Office said he understands the “anger and upset caused” after appearing to celebrate the conviction of the pregnant subpostmistress.

Ms Misra began running a Post Office in West Byfleet, Surrey, in 2005, but was suspended in 2008 after being accused of stealing £74,000.

She was handed a 15-month prison sentence on her son’s 10th birthday in November 2010 and was eight weeks pregnant when jailed.

Ms Misra’s conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal in 2021.

Following her conviction and sentence, Mr Smith sent an email to managers, including Paula Vennells, asking to “pass on my thanks” to the legal team.

His email read: “Brilliant news. Well done. Please pass on my thanks to the team.”

Screen grab taken from the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry of former Post Office managing director David Smith giving evidence
Screen grab taken from the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry of former Post Office managing director David Smith giving evidence (Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry/PA Wire)

In his witness statement to the inquiry, Mr Smith said his comment of “brilliant news” was due to the fact he believed “Horizon had been proved to be robust” following Mrs Misra’s trial.

He said: “It was intended to be a congratulatory email to the team, knowing that they had worked hard on the case.

“However, knowing what I do now, it is evident that my email would have caused Seema Misra and her family substantial distress to read, and I would like to apologise for that.

“My comment of ‘brilliant news’ was in relation to me thinking that it was brilliant news that, in my mind, Horizon had been proved to be robust following the testing of the expert evidence in the trial.

“Even if this had been a correct conviction, I would absolutely never think that it was ‘brilliant news’ for a pregnant woman to go to prison and I am hugely apologetic that my email can be read as such.

“Regardless of the result, I would have thanked the team for their work on the case.

“However, seeing this email in the light of what I know now, I understand the anger and the upset that it will have caused and sincerely apologise for that.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in