Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cyclist numbers fall across England as ministers urged to double cycle spending

Government spends £7 per head per year on cycling in England outside London – less than half the £18 per head spent in the capital

Tom Batchelor
Wednesday 31 July 2019 11:15 EDT
Comments
A cyclist make his way through solid traffic in London
A cyclist make his way through solid traffic in London (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The number of people travelling by bicycle in England fell last year, according to official figures, prompting campaigners to call on the government to ramp up spending on cycling.

Across the country as a whole, the proportion of adults cycling at least once a week fell from 12 per cent in 2015/16 to 11 per cent in 2017/18. The Department for Transport described the drop as "statistically significant".

That came despite increases in cyclist numbers in major UK cities, including London where cycling journeys grew by 5 per cent last year.

Campaigners pointed to the disparity between cycling rates in the capital and the rest of the country as proof that more money was needed to improve road safety and encourage greater numbers onto their bikes.

The government currently spends £7 per head per year on cycling in England, excluding London - less than half the £18 per head spent in the capital.

Surprisingly, the City of London recorded the largest decrease in cyclists, from 22 per cent to 11 per cent.

However, the report cautioned that the small sample size of the central London district may have skewed the result.

Men continue to outnumber women on bikes by more than two-to-one, the report showed. A perception that it is too dangerous to ride a bike is still the main reason people are put off switching to two wheels.

Male cyclists made an average of 25 trips per year compared with just 10 trips for women, with those aged 40-49 most likely to cycle.

The survey suggested little progress has been made nationally in promoting cycling as an efficient, healthy and cost-effective mode of transport.

Despite efforts to increase cycling uptake to tackle air pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, just 2 per cent of all trips made in England are completed by bike – amounting to just 1 per cent of the total distance travelled.

That compares with close to two-thirds (61 per cent) of journeys being made by car and around a quarter (27 per cent) on foot.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s head of campaigns, said: “Despite government recognising the need to encourage and enable more people to cycle regularly for health and environmental reasons, unfortunately the proportion of trips made by bike has remained largely static for 20 years. When asked what stops people from cycling more often, the common response is that it’s too dangerous.

"The reality is that cycling is not a dangerous activity, but it’s this perception which needs to be tackled.

"To do this, we need to build cycling routes separated from motor traffic, safe for a 12 year old to ride along. That requires at least a doubling of current spending on cycling and walking, which must be a priority for the Department for Transport in the forthcoming Spending Review.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in