Councils back plan for airport in Kent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Local councils are calling for the Government to build an airport as big as Heathrow in Kent to cope with the growing demand for flights.
A report published today by 70 local authorities says Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Transport, "must be bold" when deciding how to accommodate the expected rise in the number of British air passengers – from 180 million now to 500 million by 2030.
James Bailey, author of the report for the Strategic Aviation Special Interest Group (Sasig) at the Local Government Association, said he had been contacted by commercial organisations keen to begin building at Cliffe in north Kent. "They are ready to submit their proposals before the Government's deadline ... at the end of the month," he said.
Ministers are considering a new airport in Kent or new runways at Heathrow and Stansted. Building at Cliffe would bring them into conflict with residents and environmentalists, who would probably appeal to the EU under the Habitats Directive because protected bird species are living on the marshland.
Sasig says it would be cheaper to make a new protected habitat in north Kent than to make a "compulsory purchase of many thousands of homes around Heathrow".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments