Council condemns man's 'ridiculous' home security
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.They say an Englishman's home is his castle, but the maxim was pushed to its post-modern limits when a villager installed high-tech security including seven CCTV cameras and six floodlights at his listed home in the Cotswolds.
Cotswold District Council yesterday ordered Alexander Jones to take down his "ridiculous" collection of devices as they spoilt the listed former agricultural barn near Cirencester in Gloucestershire.
Mr Jones said he initially hired a 24-hour security guard at Sheepbridge Barn in Eastleach Turville. But, after seeing torchlight beaming onto the remote house, he decided to take further action.
Councillor Carole Topple said: "The security completely overcrowded his home and one resident complained of being able to see his lights shining like a beacon across the fields. It is all very over the top."
Mr Jones defended himself to the Gloucestershire Echo: "We'll be left with no alternative but to mount lights and cameras on poles around the house which will be totally out of keeping with the area and the property but which will not require planning consent."
But Jon Pugh, a council spokesman, said they had "a duty by law to preserve such buildings and their immediate surroundings."
Read more on home security
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments