Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cost of graffiti to London put at £100m a year

Matthew Beard
Monday 06 May 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Middle-class teenagers are contributing to the estimated £100m annual cost of graffiti to the capital.

A report by the Greater London Authority (GLA) says the problem is far worse than previously believed and calls for "zero tolerance" towards graffiti vandals.

The authors worked out the cost of graffiti to borough councils, public transport and the private sector. Their findings will reinforce fears over a general increase in street crime. In the past year there has been a sharp rise in muggings and mobile phone thefts.

A spokesman for the British Transport Police, which contributed to the report, said: "Two or three years ago, we considered the perpetrators as being from deprived backgrounds and single-parent families. But there is evidence today that individuals from well-ordered and better-off families are also turning to graffiti as a pastime."

Andrew Pelling, the chairman of the GLA's graffiti committee, said: "Graffiti results in unacceptable costs to Londoners. The growing costs encountered by the taxpayer and the impact on London's economy means vital cash is not being used to improve our public services."

The GLA has urged the Government to introduce legislation to ban the sale of graffiti materials to minors. The assembly also blames a lack of youth initiatives for young people "misdirecting their energies" into graffiti.

Auditors added up the cleaning bills of the local authorities. Together they spend about £7m a year scrubbing walls at schools, hospitals and businesses. Transport companies spend about £6m doing the same, the report said.

The assembly's graffiti committee has added to these figures the money it believes is lost through a lack of investment by companies deterred by graffiti, and the total comes to about £100m. The report says: "Graffiti has a negative effect on the lives of the thousands of Londoners who travel in vandalised, unpleasant buses and trains and live in areas blighted by graffiti."

London Underground said it cost up to £10m a year to replace all the windows on trains that are etched with graffiti, and millions of pounds more to remove interior panels that have been defaced and graffiti on the side of the tracks.

The bus company Arriva said 85 windows in a fleet of 25 new buses had been vandalised in one month of service.

Mr Pelling said: "We have tolerated graffiti as inevitable for far too long but we do not have to live with it or accept it as part of our urban environment. Throughout this investigation we were told about examples of good practice and educational measures which aim to reduce the prevalence of graffiti-writing. "Standards in London for combating graffiti are way below those best practices adopted in other countries and vary dramatically across boroughs. A graffiti clean-up is long overdue."

The Corporation of London, the authority for the City, spends just £1,500 a year on the problem, while graffiti costs the borough that spends the most, Wandsworth, £625,000.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in