Woman paralysed after being ‘catapulted’ from bed during sex loses seven-figure damages claim
Judge rules bed was not to blame and concludes fall was ‘tragic accident’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A woman left paralysed after she was “catapulted” from her new bed during sex has lost a seven-figure claim for damages.
Claire Busby, from Maidenhead, Berkshire, took legal action against Berkshire Bed Company, also known as Beds Are Uzzz, who she claimed sold her a faulty product.
Ms Busby, 46, suffered a serious spinal injury when she fell from the super-king-size double divan as she was changing sex position.
She claimed the bed was in a “defective state” at the time of the accident but a High Court judge ruled on Friday her fall was a “tragic accident”.
Judge Barry Cotter said: “The claim in relation to this tragic accident, which is what I find it was – a simple accident – fails.”
Ms Busby told the court she was injured a week after the bed’s delivery while having sex with her then-partner, John Marshall.
She said she was kneeling in the middle of the bed then “swung her legs” from underneath her to change position, before lying back with her head towards the foot of the bed.
She claimed the bed then gave way and she fell off the end, landing on her head.
Ms Busby said: “I spun around, I put my hand down and then I felt like I was catapulted off the back of the bed.”
Two gliders, or feet, were found to be missing from the foot of the bed, but this was not believed to be the cause of the accident.
Judge Cotter concluded a “much more likely cause” was the “unusual position” Ms Busby was in, kneeling back on her feet towards the foot of the bed.
He added: “Having carefully considered the totality of the evidence I am not satisfied that the difference in level between the two divans played any part in Ms Busby’s loss of balance backwards.
“Rather, I am satisfied that this was a simple but tragic fall; she simply overbalanced probably in part because she was sitting on a mattress as opposed to a firm surface and underestimated the amount of give underneath her body.”
Richard Manders, director of Berkshire Bed Company, welcomed the ruling.
“We are delighted the court has ruled in our favour,” he said. “We are sorry that Ms Busby was injured and we wish her and her family well for the future.”
Agencies contributed to this report
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments