Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Change in whistleblowing law 'will put lives at risk'

David Connett
Saturday 26 May 2012 17:33 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Plans to reform whistleblowing laws will put lives at risk by deterring workers from coming forward to expose wrongdoing, critics warned yesterday.

Business ministers propose changing legislation – the 1998 Public Interest Disclosure Act (Pida) – by introducing a public interest test, to plug a loophole that is being abused by bankers as a legal tactic in pay and bonus rows. But critics say the test will put off employees with genuine fears from coming forward.

Ministers quietly included the test in the Enterprise Bill introduced in the Queen's speech earlier this month. It is designed to counter the rise in Pida cases from 157 in 2000 to 1,761 in 2009. Legal experts believe the increase is dominated by so-called "pale stale males" exploiting the law as a litigation tactic in disputes with financial institutions.

Cathy James, the chief executive of Public Concern at Work, said: "This risks undermining what is a greatly misunderstood piece of legislation. We strongly urge ministers to reconsider."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in