Brexit: Date set for first legal hearing to stop Article 50 being triggered by Prime Minister
Lawyers for Deir Dos Santos say the decision must be taken through Parliament
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The first legal action against Brexit by a private citizen has been timetabled for 19 July on behalf of a hairdresser.
Lawyers representing Deir Dos Santos, a British citizen, have lodged a judicial review challenge. It will argue that triggering Article 50 - formally beginning the process of the UK's withdrawal from the European Union – can only be done with Parliament's approval and not just by the Prime Minister.
The majority of MPs in Parliament voted to remain in the EU and the lawsuit seeks to delay leaving the organisation. It also highlights how the approach of a pro-Brexit Prime Minister, such as Andrea Leadsom, could mean the UK’s exit strategy is markedly different to that of a pro-Remain leader, such as Theresa May.
Hairdresser Mr Dos Santos is "just an ordinary guy," his lawyer, Dominic Chambers QC, told Bloomberg. "If his rights are going to be taken away, he wants it done in a proper and lawful manner."
Mr Chambers added: “The purpose of a judicial review is to correct the executive when they have gone wrong. We say the executive will be abusing their powers if they give an Article 50 notification without the approval of Parliament.”
The claim, reported in the Guardian, will argue: “The result of the referendum is not legally binding in the sense that it is advisory only and there is no obligation [on the government] to give effect to the referendum decision.
“However the prime minister has stated on numerous occasions that it is his intention to give effect to the referendum decision and organise the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.
“The extract from the prime minister’s resignation speech ... makes it clear that [the government] is of the view that the prime minister of the day has the power under article 50 (2) of the Lisbon treaty to trigger article 50 without reference to parliament.”
But exiting the EU can only be done with the permission of the British Parliament, the claim said.
The government has acknowledged receipt of the claim but is highly likely to fight it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments