Boris Johnson wins ruling over ban on Christian group's controversial 'gay cure' ads
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Christian group promoting “gay cure” therapies has lost its bid to sue Transport for London (TfL) after Boris Johnson refused to allow their adverts on London buses.
Sitting at the High Court, Mrs Justice Lang ruled that the Mayor of London did not abuse his position as chairman of TfL when he imposed the ban.
The judge did criticise TfL for the “procedurally unfair” way the ban was brought about after the transport network initially agreed to run the adverts, pictured above, from Core Issues Trust, an evangelical Christian group.
But she accepted that was outweighed by factors against allowing the ad, including that it would “cause grave offence” to those who were gay, and was perceived as homophobic, “thus increasing the risk of prejudice and homophobic attacks”.
Core Issues has been given permission to test her decision in the Court of Appeal.
Stonewall chief executive Ben Summerskill welcomed the ruling. “Had these voodoo ‘gay cure’ adverts appeared in the pages of The Spectator or The Daily Telegraph it’s unlikely there would have been complaints,” he said.
“It’s perfectly proper for a mayor to object to the use of such advertising in an iconic public setting.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments