Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blunkett orders new crackdown on asylum

Ian Burrell,Home Affairs Correspondent
Friday 29 November 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Home Secretary, David Blunkett, moved yesterday to reduce the chances of asylum-seekers making successful claims after the number of applications rose to the highest level in a three-month period.

Mr Blunkett scrapped the "exceptional leave to remain" (ELR) arrangement under which most successful asylum applicants are allowed to stay in the country. The decision meansthousands of migrants who were given the right to live temporarily in Britain because of "compelling or compassionate" grounds, could now be sent home.

Refugee support groups described the move as shocking and deeply disturbing.

The Home Office acted after new asylum statistics showed that 22,560 applications were made in the three months from July to September, a record quarterly total. The figure represents an 11 per cent increase on the previous three months and a 20 per cent rise on the same period in 2001.

There has been a surge in applications from Iraq, Zimbabwe and Somalia, although claims from Afghanistan have fallen. The increase was partly caused by breaches in security at French rail freight depots, allowing hundreds of asylum seekers to stowaway on cross-Channel trains to Britain.

The Immigration minister, Beverley Hughes, said ELR was being abused. She said: "I believe that our use of ELR has encouraged abuse and acted as a pull factor, encouraging economic migrants to apply for asylum in the UK in the belief that they will be given ELR when their asylum claim is rejected."

Habib Rahman, of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said: "This is shocking and not the action of a progressive or democratic government."

Leigh Daynes, of Refugee Action, said: "The abolition of ELR is deeply disturbing. As global political events and human rights abuses continue to uproot innocent people, the Government must extend protection to those who need it."

Last year, 21,175 asylum applicants were given ELR, almost twice as many as the 12,610 granted refugee status, which entitles individuals to full citizen's rights.

Many of those given ELR, which allows people to work and claim benefits for a four-year period until their case is reviewed, were permitted to stay because of family members already living in Britain. Others were given ELR because they had been in Britain for several years with irregular immigration status.

The Government is replacing ELR with a new status called "humanitarian protection", which officials said would be "much tighter" and would only apply to claimants who proved they could not safely return home. A Home Office spokesman said 25 per cent of claimants were given ELR and the Government wanted the number under the new system to fall to 10 per cent.

Jessica Yudilevich, of the Refugee Council, said it was wrong for Britain to have "targets for protection". She said: "Someone either needs protecting or they do not."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in