Binyam to sue company over rendition flight
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An American court has cleared the way for two British residents released from Guantanamo Bay to sue a subsidiary of the international aviation company Boeing over complicity in their rendition.
The lawsuit, brought by five men including Binyam Mohamed and Bisher al-Rawi, alleges that Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc, a California-based company, knowingly provided extensive flight services that enabled the CIA to carry out the renditions. The US government sought to intervene in the case and asserted "state secrets privilege" on behalf of itself and Jeppesen. Under US constitutional law, the government can claim state secrets privilege when "there is a reasonable danger that compulsion of the evidence will expose military matters which, in the interest of national security, should not be divulged".
But yesterday a US Federal Court rejected this defence and instructed the District Court to proceed with the case. Lawyers for Mr Mohamed began legal action against Jeppesen in 2007 for its alleged role in the illegal transfer of prisoners between secret overseas detention centres. The company is said to have supplied logistical support and to have profited from a lucrative contract in transporting prisoners.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments