Cost of renovating Big Ben doubles to £61m
A joint statement from the Lords and the Commons acknowledged previous ‘estimating failures’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Parliamentary authorities have said the costs of renovating the Elizabeth Tower in the Palace of Westminster, which houses the bell known as Big Ben, will now double to an estimated £61m.
The conservation work on the clock tower was originally priced at £29 million in the spring of 2016.
The repair effort caused controversy when it was announced that Big Ben would only chime on special occasions over the next four years while the works were being carried out.
Parliament said the dramatic price increase came as the contractors tasked with the restoration work gained a better understanding of the complexity of the renovation work.
A spokeswoman for the House of Commons told the Press Association: “The commissions expressed their disappointment in the cost increases, and the unreliability of the original estimate.
“They instructed officials to provide regular updates on progress and costs to the relevant domestic committees so they can keep the commissions fully informed of the project.
“They also reiterated their commitment to preserve the Elizabeth Tower and Great Clock for future generations."
In a joint statement the clerk of the House of Commons, the clerk of the Parliaments and the director general of the House of Commons, said: “We acknowledge that there have been estimating failures and we understand the concern of the commissions.
“In advance of tendering contracts, the initial high level estimates were set at a lower level to avoid cost escalation from the market.
“Subsequent estimates, using better data and more extensive surveys, better reflect the true likelihood of the costs.
“We believe that we now have a more accurate estimate of the cost of the works and will report regularly to the committees on the progress of work.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments