Key decision due in fight over Bibby Stockholm migrant barge in Dorset
Carralyn Parkes wants a judge to give her the go-ahead to challenge the lawfulness of the use of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland Harbour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A local mayor is waiting to see whether she has won the first stage of a High Court fight with Home Secretary Suella Braverman over the housing of asylum seekers on a barge.
Carralyn Parkes wants Mr Justice Holgate to give her the go-ahead to challenge the lawfulness of the use of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland Harbour, Dorset.
Mr Justice Holgate considered arguments at a High Court hearing in London on Tuesday and is listed to deliver a ruling on Wednesday.
Mrs Parkes, a member of Portland Town Council and the Mayor of Portland, says she is “deeply concerned” by the government’s “planned accommodation” on the Bibby Stockholm.
Lawyers representing Mrs Braverman say Mrs Parkes’s challenge should be dismissed.
Mrs Parkes, who is from Liverpool, has argued that the housing of asylum seekers on the barge is a “breach of planning control” and says there has not been “compliance” with environmental impact assessment duties.
She is also arguing that Mrs Braverman has not complied with duties under the 2010 Equality Act.
Lawyers representing Mrs Braverman say the challenge was made to a decision taken in April to house “destitute asylum seekers on a specially adapted” barge.
They argued that Mrs Parkes’s claim was “out of time”, “without merit” and said the judge should refuse to give permission for the challenge to proceed to a trial.
Government lawyers said the local planning authority did not think planning permission was required.
They also argued there was no “general principle” that housing “non-British asylum seekers” together on a vessel was “unlawful” under a public sector equality duty.