Grant Shapps forced to insist Bibby Stockholm migrants’ barge is not a ‘death trap’
‘There’s no reason why it wouldn’t be absolutely safe,’ energy secretary says amid ongoing concerns about scheme
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Grant Shapps has been forced to insist the Bibby Stockholm “quasi-prison” that will house asylum seekers is not a “deathtrap” following fire risk warnings.
The Fire Brigade Union (FBU) said it would write to the energy secretary about concerns with overcrowding and access to fire exits in the barge.
It comes as the timetable for migrants to move onto the Bibby Stockholm was pushed back once again due to ongoing checks by the Health and Safety Executive at Portland Port.
But Mr Shapps refuted the warning from the FBU as he insisted “there’s no reason why it wouldn’t be absolutely safe”.
Speaking to ITV’s Good Morning Britain, he said: “It certainly won’t be a deathtrap.”
“This actual ship was previously used by Germany to house migrants, there’s no reason why it wouldn’t be absolutely safe,” he continued. “Ships are used to transport people all the time and there’s no inherent reason why that [not being safe] would be the case.
“That’s actually why these final safety checks are being carried out.”
A Home Office source denied the delays were related to fire risks and said they were partly due to local authorities’ preferences on the timing of new services.
When asked if asylum seekers will be housed on the Bibby Stockholm barge next week, Rishi Sunak told LBC’s Nick Ferrari on Wednesday: “The Bibby Stockholm will be in operation as soon as it’s passed all the checks and regulations – as soon as possible – that’s the key thing.”
An LBC caller accused the prime minister of “putting UK citizens in danger” as she demanded to know when the scheme would begin.
She said: “Unvetted illegal immigrants, what I call economic migrants coming over from on boats, it’s just not acceptable.”
Mr Sunak replied the arrival of people in small boats via the English Channel can’t stop “soon enough”, adding: “This is an example of me doing something different that hasn’t been done before to help solve a serious problem.”
The prime minister highlighted the Illegal Migration Act, which would see anyone who arrives in the UK illegally to be deported, before adding: “We’re making a difference, I’m going to keep going on this ... I’m going to throw everything at it.”
Mr Sunak said despite “an array of people that want me to fail” - including Labour, criminal gangs and “dodgy lawyers” - he will “keep going” to “stop the boats”.
However, legal organiser Brian Dikoff said its lawyers had sent “formal correspondence” to the Home Office questioning whether the barge amounts to unlawful detention, because migrants cannot freely move around Portland Port and must be taken out by an official bus.
“We are particularly concerned that many asylum seekers are not going to be able to move freely and in effect, will be detained,” he added.
Katy Robinson, a partner at Wilson Solicitors, said it was representing several clients who had received official notices saying they would be moved to the barge “imminently”.
She said the Home Office had suspended some transfers already, but that there were also concerns about the “adequacy of accommodation on board in general”.
Ms Robinson said they the firm has written to Government Legal Department outlining their concerns and is awaiting a response.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments