Arms move risks dangerous divisions in Unionist parties
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Internal links
Leading article: Mr Adams's words must not lead to another false dawn
Adams urges IRA to give up arms to save peace in Northern Ireland
The key players in decommissioning negotiations
Arms move risks dangerous divisions in Unionist parties
The expected IRA move on decommissioning will provide a huge opportunity and a major challenge to the Protestant and Unionist community, many of whom never expected to see such a development.
Those Unionists who want the Good Friday Agreement to succeed, such as Unionist leader David Trimble, will celebrate because, finally, the republican movement is meeting some of their demands. But to many other Unionists, against the Agreement, decommissioning will be politically unwelcome.
Protestants are deeply fractured, with six separate Unionist parties represented in the Belfast Assembly. In party-political terms the first key figure will be Mr Trimble, who will claim he has achieved what he has insisted on since the mid-Nineties. His initial crucial judgement will be to weigh whether the type of decommissioning on offer, and its scale, would be enough for him to sell to a sceptical party. His party is deeply divided on his own leadership (more than 40 per cent voted against him in a contest last year) and on the Agreement and the peace process.
If he decides the IRA has delivered enough for him to consider returning to government with Sinn Fein, he will have to take on the strong anti-Agreement wing of his party. This includes substantial figures such as MPs Jeffrey Donaldson and David Burnside. Some elements who have always opposed the accord, will say any decommissioning offer does not go far enough, or no amount of decommissioning is enough to compensate for having Sinn Fein in government.
The anti-Agreement camp has swollen over the past year, restricting Mr Trimble's room for manoeuvre and adding to the general Protestant disillusion with politics. Recent election results have shown a considerable swing from the Ulster Unionists and major gains for Dr Ian Paisley's Democratic Unionists.
Reversing this trend will be a formidable task: it could be undertaken only after large-scale decommissioning. Even then there is no guarantee the traditionally sceptical Protestant population will be swayed.
If Mr Trimble does decide to go for it, his only hope is that the arms move will be of the most far-reaching type, since what is needed is a transformation of the attitudes of the Unionist political classes, and the voters.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments