Archie Battersbee: Family can appeal decision to turn off brain-damaged boy’s life support
Parents’ barrister says evidence has not shown ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ 12-year-old boy is dead
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A family has been granted permission to appeal a ruling allowing doctors to switch a brain-damaged boy’s life support off.
The High Court said last week that medical professionals could legally stop treating 12-year-old Archie Battersbee, who has not regained consciousness since an “accident” in April.
This judge previously said the boy had been dead since the end of May and doctors at the Royal London Hospital could “cease to ventilate” him “mechanically”.
But his mother, Hollie Dance, said she was “sickened” by the ruling and did not believe her son was being given enough time.
She went to the High Court on Monday with Archie’s father, Paul Battersbee, to ask permission to mount an appeal.
The High Court has now given them the go-ahead to take the case to the Court of Appeal.
The family had to establish they had an arguable or compelling case for the judge to agree to a full appeal hearing.
On Monday, a barrister leading their legal team argued evidence had not shown “beyond reasonable doubt” that Archie is dead but the decision had been made on a balance of probabilities.
Edward Devereux QC said a decision of such “gravity” should have been made on a “beyond reasonable doubt” basis.
The barrister also argued the court erred by failing to accommodate the religious views of Archie and his family in relation to the declaration of death.
Mrs Justice Arbuthnot decided that appeal judges should consider that standard of proof issue.
She said Court of Appeal judges had never considered that standard of proof issue in relation to “declaration of death” cases and that issue provided a compelling reason why appeal judges should consider the case.
Christian Legal Centre, which is supporting Archie’s parents, said it would “stand by” the family after they were given the go-ahead to appeal on Monday.
“Archie’s parents believe that the time and manner of his death should be determined by God and claim a right to pray for a miracle until and unless that happens. That belief must be respected,” its chief executive said.
The High Court had previously been asked to decide what was best for the boy as his parents were pushing back against proposals by doctors, who believe Archie is “brain-stem dead”, to switch off his life support.
Mrs Justice Arbuthnot ruled last Monday: “I find that Archie died at noon on May 31 2022, which was shortly after the MRI scans taken that day. I find that irreversible cessation of brain stem function has been conclusively established.”
The judge added: “I give permission to the medical professionals at the Royal London Hospital to cease to ventilate mechanically Archie Battersbee.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments