Appeal court says criminals' wives' assets untouchable
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Millions of pounds worth of criminal assets, including luxury homes and jewellery, will remain out of the reach of the state after a landmark ruling by the Appeal Court.
The wife of a convicted drug smuggler successfully argued in court that it was illegal for the authorities to confiscate her share of the couple's wealth.
Britain's law enforcement and prosecuting agencies, including Customs and the Serious Organised Crime Agency, are studying the implications of the ruling, which leaves them powerless to confiscate criminal proceeds from a spouse who has not been convicted of any offence where property is jointly owned.
Three Court of Appeal judges said there was no "legal principle or public policy" that permitted Revenue and Customs to deprive Marion Gibson of half her share of £5,430,671 which the courts had ruled was the value of criminal proceeds her husband must pay back to the state.
Gene Gibson, 48, from Warrington, was jailed in 1999 for 25 years and given a confiscation order for conspiracy to import cocaine. At confiscation proceedings brought by the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office in 2000, it was estimated that he had made more than £38m drug trafficking. His wife instructed lawyers to fight the confiscation order on the grounds that she would be made "destitute" if forced to sell the family home. The Court of Appeal held last week that Mrs Gibson's half interest in the home she shared with her husband and their children, plus other financial instruments, could not be confiscated.
Gene Gibson has paid back £25,644.84 out of an original debt that with interest now stands at £8.4m.
Criminal law experts warned last night that the ruling gave the green light to crime bosses to protect their wealth by sharing it with their wives. Rodney Warren, director of the Criminal Law Solicitors Association, said the authorities "would now be at a distinct disadvantage" in enforcing confiscation orders.
Alun Milford, head of the Asset Forfeiture Division at the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office, vowed to pursue Gibson. He said: "We are very keen to ensure court orders are enforced."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments