Anger at MoD delays over scientist's inquest
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The family of a Ministry of Defence scientist who died during secret explosives testing hit out yesterday at alleged "inadequate" safety procedures and delays in getting answers.
Terry Jupp's family have had to wait eight years for his inquest to begin. As it did so yesterday, jurors heard about a married father-of-two whose secretive work was probably "instrumental in saving many lives".
At the beginning of an inquest in Southend, expected to last four weeks, Coroner Dr Peter Dean complimented the Jupp family on the "tremendous determination and dignity" shown during a "long and difficult process". He explained to jurors that the family had to endure a five-year wait while the case went through the criminal courts and four postponements to the inquest.
Mr Jupp suffered 60 to 90 per cent burns after an explosion at a testing station near Shoeburyness, Essex, on 14 August 2002. The 46-year-old employee of the Defence, Scientific and Technological Laboratory (DSTL) was taken to hospital, but died six days later.
Dr Dean explained to jurors that due to the "sensitivity and highly classified nature" of Mr Jupp's work, some of the evidence would have to be held in private, while at other times codes and ciphers would be used to protect information and personnel.
Prior to the first witness being called, the coroner read out three family statements. Mr Jupp's elderly parents, Roy and Anne, said the family believed there were "serious safety issues" surrounding his death, suggesting that there were "inadequate" precautions despite Mr Jupp's own high safety standards.
In her statement, Mr Jupp's wife, Pat, described her anguish as her husband deteriorated in hospital following the blast. She explained how she had to deal with his failing health while also trying to explain it to his two children, Katie and Matthew, then aged 15 and 11.
Charges of gross negligent manslaughter were brought against two men, only to be dropped later.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments