Usual for ministers to make representations on national security, No 10 says
The decision follows a letter David Lammy wrote to Angela Rayner over the proposed new Chinese embassy.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Downing Street has said it is to be expected for ministers to make representations on national security matters after it was reported that David Lammy wrote to Angela Rayner advising her to take responsibility for the decision over a new Chinese embassy.
A Number 10 spokesman suggested it was usual for ministers to make clear if they think decisions should be taken at a ministerial level rather than by local councils.
The go-ahead on the proposed embassy will be offered or refused by ministers, having been “called in” by the Government, after it was rejected by local council Tower Hamlets.
The decision to call it in was taken by Angela Rayner in October, and the Telegraph reported on Thursday that Foreign Secretary Mr Lammy had written to her the previous month asking her to do so.
There have been concerns that the new embassy – planned for near the Tower of London – could be used for spying purposes.
Asked about the report, a Number 10 spokesman said on Thursday: “We’ve always been clear that national security is the first duty of Government and it’s been a core priority throughout this process.
“Of course, you’d expect ministers to submit written representations on issues where there are national security ramifications, where in their view it would be more appropriate for a decision to be taken at ministerial level rather than by local government.”
According to a letter obtained by the Telegraph under freedom of information, Mr Lammy asked Ms Rayner in her position as Housing Secretary to consider calling in the application for a decision.
“As a new Embassy, I consider that this application is clearly in the interest of a foreign government, and of more than local importance,” Mr Lammy said.
The embassy development comes as the UK Government seeks to forge closer trade links with Beijing, amid concerns over Chinese interference in the UK.
A Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office spokesperson said: “As has been widely reported, both the Foreign Secretary and the Home Secretary submitted written representations on this issue given the national security ramifications.”