Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Almost 90% of British public cannot name their local police and crime commissioner

 

Neil Lancefield
Monday 25 February 2013 05:52 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Almost 90% of people cannot name the police and crime commissioner (PCC) for their area, according to a new poll.

The survey was carried out by the Electoral Reform Society, which said November's PCC elections “failed both candidates and voters alike”.

PCCs, which replaced existing police authorities in 41 force areas across England and Wales, have the power to set force budgets and even hire and fire chief constables.

But the process was marred by a record-low turnout with only around one in seven bothering to go to the ballot box, prompting a detailed inquiry by the Electoral Commission.

In its report, the Electoral Reform Society described November's poll as “an exercise in how not to run an election”.

The campaign group claimed people were “left in the dark about who they could vote for”, while the turnout was reduced because the election was held in the winter.

It also said candidates were kept away by “huge deposits, unclear eligibility rules, vast electoral districts and high campaign costs”.

A survey of over 1,000 adults commissioned by the society found just 11% of people know who their elected PCC is.

The society made a number of recommendations for the next PCC election, which included not holding a poll in winter, ensuring a “level playing field for candidates through well-designed election rules”, and posting information on the candidates to voters.

Last week electoral staff said voters were not at the heart of the PCC elections.

The Association of Electoral Administrators reported that information was not readily accessible and not well co-ordinated at a national level.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in